🔗 Share this article

Tbecame clear he could survive a loss to lower-league opposition. He weathered a decisive European final against a particularly poor Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood home defeats against West Ham and Wolves, finishing 15th, the tactical inflexibility, laying waste to some of the club’s best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom the Portuguese coach was not permitted to engage. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' championship campaign, the coach took on Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the irony here: a manager who often railed his squad for failing in individual battles succumbing in the face of the white heat and animal charisma of a England's top division's most intimidating sporting directors.

And frankly, this whole bruising episode seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a whole new light. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to view him as little more than a functionary in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due largely to his friendship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any demonstrable skill. How wrong everyone was. By masterfully outmanoeuvring the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the unfortunate a previous executive earlier, he has proved himself to be among football's strategic masterminds: a tactical intellect that United’s mid-table rivals are now justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Clash Regarding Formation and Ideology

To illustrate, this was Jason Wilcox who being involved in the leadership that appointed the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in attempting to convince Amorim to abandon his favored 3-4-3. Naturally, these entreaties faced pushback. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when issued by a man of a man the unimpeachable football pedigree he possesses, holder of international appearances and a contributor to a championship team from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to explain his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point questions may arise regarding why the coach is walking away with a full payout, with no compensation reduction clause activated. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. If he ever did speak, most likely we would perceive is a series of high-frequency signals and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not the same as being ready to receive.

An Supreme Power In Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we overlook the real power behind the modern United throne. The director is, in reality, simply carrying out the directives of his ultimate line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his desire for a back four. According to reports, the owner has also proposed deploying the forward as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to embrace data science and analytics. Per reports, in an executive meeting soon after his investment, he declared that the team's approach of play “will be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in industry and sailing. Most importantly he is immensely wealthy, and it is known, the wealthy are superior: more perceptive, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply better. Who else would you trust to oversee an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a modern arena that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

A Modern Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Over Coaches

This represents a shift that is becoming prevalent in top-tier football. For decades, teams mistakenly delegated major sporting choices to subordinate staff like managers, talent spotters – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for a young, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to join an organization and implement their plan supported to fruition. But how many businesses have these guys established? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Far preferable to place genuine authority where it rightly belongs: the executive class, the open-necked shirt brigade, the individuals with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the strategy by the directors and appoint someone who will adapt their offering accordingly. If managers were formerly chefs, they are now more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not responsible for the product, yet finally accountable should it be delivered cold or fails of the box.

In the meantime, their job has become not about defining the vision and more about marketing it: the receptionist on the front desk, the public face of an organisation they have minimal power to change. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into the Champions League and secures domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for speaking out. A manager at Celtic sees his reputation ruined while the people who appointed him continue to make errors indefinitely.

A Neoliberal Football: Accountability Only for the Few

And perhaps in a small way this is simply corporate governance in action: the rise of a privileged overclass who are infallible, whose decisions are always untouchable, whose mistakes can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the 3-4-3 coach and then dismiss them for playing too much that system. Hire the project manager and then bin them for taking excessive time. And above all be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for the latest player acquisitions, for the reality that the adults – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.