🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their loved ones.

A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a school trip to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the grave of a former paratrooper who died while serving abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Clarity

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some want additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official confirmed the burial sites were under the care of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “This concerns many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.